Government agencies also may reduce the risk of erroneous deprivation by ensuring that regulations are not arbitrary or discriminatory, and by defining reasonable classifications. If the risk is high then additional procedures would be merited. If the risk of error is minimal, then the need for additional procedures declines. The second part of the test assesses the risk of the possibility that a person will be mistakenly deprived of the interest because of the need for additional or different procedural safeguards. Later court decisions have shown that this part of the test is subjective, calling on courts to make judgment calls on the relative merit of the interest at stake. The Court acknowledged that the receipt of benefits was an important private interest, which satisfies the first part of the test focusing on whether or not a private interest is at stake. The claim was that the administrative procedures in place by the government violated his constitutional right to due process. In Mathews, the plaintiff accused the federal government of terminating his social security disability benefits without an evidentiary hearing prior to termination. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976), when it announced a three-part balancing test that lower courts must apply when analyzing procedural due process cases. The Court resolved this issue in Mathews v. As a result, the Supreme Court had to sort out how much process was enough to constitute due process. Aggrieved individuals used these precedents to litigate various issues involving the termination of employment, government benefits, professional licensure, and other interests involving administrative law matters. The test balances (1) the importance of the interest at stake (2) the risk of an erroneous deprivation of the interest because of the procedures used, and the probable value of additional procedural safeguards and (3) the government's interest.ĭecisions by the Supreme Court in the 1960s enhanced the due process rights of individuals under both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. A three-part test that determines whether an individual has receiveddue process under the Constitution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |